A record 4.2 million Americans will turn 65 this year, confronting unprecedented senior housing challenges amid rising longevity and costs. Seniorly unveils the 2025 list of where older adults should look to retire.
In 2025, a record 4.2 million Americans will turn 65 and enter retirement age. While this phase of life is typically seen as a time of relaxation and enjoyment, seniors today are navigating an unprecedented set of challenges in a rapidly changing world.
They are retiring at a time marked by economic uncertainty and inflation. A recent AARP study found 20% of adults ages 50+ have no retirement savings, and 61% are worried they will not have enough money to support themselves in retirement.
Healthcare costs are also skyrocketing. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported national health spending surged across the board in 2023 – the most recent year on record – including for Medicare (8.1%), Medicaid (7.9%), out of pocket costs (7.2%), hospitals (10.4%) and prescription drugs (11.4%). CMS projects that from 2023-32, average national health expenditures will grow 5.6%, which will outpace average GDP growth of 4.3%.
On the flip side, the outlook for longer and happier lives is looking up as the influx of seniors means more vibrant, supportive and social communities than ever before.
Life expectancy is rising again after a dip during the pandemic, and Americans who turn 65 can expect to live another 19.9 years. That may just be the tip of the iceberg as futurists and scientists explore how techological and other scientific breakthroughs will impact longevity.
Scientists in the UK recently created an AI-based aging clock that predicts people’s health and lifespan by analyzing their blood, and Fortune even hosted a panel called: The 1,000-Year-Old Human: Will AI Make Death Optional?
When you combine longer lifespans with rising costs, it becomes more critical than ever to retire in a place that is affordable, has accessible healthcare, and offers a strong community and social life for seniors.
To help older adults evaluate the impact of location on the aging experience, Seniorly ranked the best and worst states to retire based on nine metrics spread across three categories: affordability, quality of life, and health care.
The nine metrics include cost of living, income taxes, Supplemental Security payments, weather, entertainment options, availability of doctors, long-term care spending, the community of older adults, and overall health status.
The complete methodology is at the bottom.
The nation’s capital came out on top, with top scores on the availability of doctors (769 per 10,000 older adults), long-term care spending through Medicaid ($12,993 per senior), and recreational opportunities such as golf courses, museums, theaters, and sports arenas (775 per 100,000 older adults). However, Washington, D.C., isn’t exactly cheap, with one of the highest costs of living and maximum personal income tax rates (10.75%) in the U.S.
The rest of the top 10 best states to retire consisted of New England states such as No. 7 Vermont, No. 9 Rhode Island, and No. 10 Maine, which boast high quality of life and health care, as well as Mountain West states like No. 2 Montana, No. 3 Wyoming, No. 6 South Dakota and No. 8 North Dakota, which have a high quality of life and are more affordable.
Notably, Wyoming, Alaska and South Dakota all have no personal income tax, while No. 5 Pennsylvania has the highest average Supplemental Security Income payment in the country ($1,240). However, it should be noted that none of the top 10 states score well when it comes to weather.
New Jersey is the worst state to retire, driven by its high cost of living and income tax rate of 10.75% for top earners. It lands in the middle of the pack when it comes to the size of its older community (17.7%), its Supplemental Security Income payment ($660), and the availability of arts and recreational facilities (268 per 100,000 older adults).
Apart from New Jersey, No. 45 Massachusetts and No. 49 Kansas were the only non-Southern states to rank in the bottom 10. Massachusetts was brought down by its high costs – it is the least affordable state for seniors in the U.S. – while Kansas had a low quality of life and poor health care.
Meanwhile, the rest of the bottom 10 spanned the Southeast and Southwest: No. 50 Alabama, No. 48 Georgia, No. 47 Oklahoma, No. 46 Mississippi, No. 44 South Carolina, No. 43 Texas and No. 42 Arizona. These states tended to have unhealthy seniors and below-average spending on long-term care. However, they did typically have larger older populations, lower costs of living and among the best weather in the country.
This category considered a state’s cost of living – measured as an index score where 100 represents the U.S. average – as well as personal income taxes and federal and state payments through Supplemental Security Income. Pennsylvania, Iowa and Tennessee ranked best for affordability, while Massachusetts, California and New York were the worst.
This category included weather, access to recreational opportunities, and the size of the state’s older community. The best quality of life for seniors can be found in Montana, Maine and Florida, while Texas, Utah and Washington have it the worst.
This category tracked the availability of doctors in the state, as well as Medicaid spending on long-term care services and the overall health of the older population. Older adults in Washington, D.C., Alaska and Vermont have the best health care, while those in Florida, Delaware and Alabama struggle the most.
Ultimately, the best state to retire depends on how you prioritize a combination of factors, including climate, cost of living, health care quality, and leisure opportunities. Retirees should consider these elements and others – like proximity to family – to find the perfect location to spend their golden years.
We used the most recent data for nine metrics across three categories to determine the best states to retire. We used a Z-score distribution to scale each metric relative to the mean across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and capped outliers at +/-3. We multiplied Z-scores by -1 when a higher score was considered negative, for example having a higher cost of living and higher rates of income taxes and chronic conditions. A state’s overall ranking was calculated using its average Z-score across the nine metrics. Washington, D.C. and Hawaii were missing temperature data, so their overall scores were created using the remaining metrics. Here’s a closer look at the data we used:
Affordability
Quality of life
Health care
Christine Healy is the Chief Growth Officer at Seniorly, a senior living technology company. Christine has over 20 years driving growth and acquisitions and has worked in mission-driven sectors, including early education, educational travel and senior living.
Seniorly’s Senior Living experts created a comprehensive handbook to help people age happily while ensuring they love where they live. Enter your email address below to receive your copy and learn more about Healthy Aging and Senior Living.*
*By submitting your email address above, you consent to receive occasional email communications from Seniorly, including educational content and tips, newsletters, and other relevant updates and offerings. You can unsubscribe at any time and we will never sell or distribute your email address to a third party. You can view our Privacy Policy here.